Geoengineering Map Updates
Biomass sinking in the deep ocean: Blue-washing with significant environmental risks
Rivers, bays, oceans: Marine and freshwater environments at risk from carbon removal companies that are altering water chemistry
Artificially fertilising the ocean in order to sink carbon as a climate solution is gathering momentum
Weak voluntary certification and flawed carbon accounting are legitimising the biochar boom
Geoengineering the stratosphere: Funding for high-altitude geoengineering research is increasing massively
Geoengineering the Earth’s Surface: Developments in making our planet more reflective
Geoengineering from space: the final frontier for planetary-scale climate manipulation?
Geoengineering the clouds: Solar radiation management in the lower atmosphere
Carbon markets are driving the biochar boom despite questionable climate claims
BECCS carbon credit sales hit record levels despite increasing environmental and economic concerns
Arctic ice management and other marine geoengineering projects should remain science fiction
Dumping biomass in the open ocean is an unproven carbon removal strategy, but that hasn’t stopped companies from selling carbon credits from it
Carbon market-driven experiments in the open ocean endanger the marine environment
They can’t see the wood for the MechanicalTrees™: Recent Direct Air Capture projects are more successful at capturing funding than carbon
CCUS is boosting corporate profits even though many schemes could actually result in more emissions
Over-promising and under-delivering for half a century: CCS is still a risky and unproven technology
Growing concerns about Biochar safety and carbon markets
CCS and DAC continue to fail to deliver despite over a century of R&D
Venture capital and carbon credits fuel an explosion of marine geoengineering projects
Geoengineering Map Update: Carbon markets are a major driver for geoengineering
Commercialization in geoengineering continues to increase
Marine Geoengineering – Quarterly Review III (part 2)
